The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Figure 6a. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Figure 6b. Figures 6a­b. Comparative Analysis of NMAI 008386.000 (bottom) to historic Pitt Rivers Museum (top) photograph demonstrating similar patterns of loss and other shared markers. 1. This area of loss is visible [on Figure 6a] but to a lesser extent than [on Figure 6b]. 2. This area of loss is visible [on Figure 6a] but not to the extent present [on Figure 6b]. The amount of loss and bead positions is different. 3. The warp/weft fiber visible [on Figure 6b] is identical to [Figure 6a]. The line of loss is also identical. 4. The top portion of this loss [on Figure 6b] is visible [on Figure 6a]. The lower portion of the loss [on Figure 6b] post dates the [loss on Figure 6a]. 5. The loss on [Figure 6b] post dates [loss on Figure 6a] but some small loss at this location is already visible [on Figure 6a]. Just not to this extent. (Marian Kaminitz and Kelly McHugh, personal communication 3/21/2011) Figure 6a. Photograph courtesy of the Pitt Rivers Museum (image 1998.190.3.2-O.tif). Figure 6b. Photograph by NMAI staff (image 008386_000_b02_20100802_cn.tif). 10