The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

That imbalance proved to affect the detail in which council was able to answer the bulk of the community's questions, as the majority centred on transactions dealing with absent Economic Development Committee director Ken Hill, without whom councillors said they weren't in a position to answer. There were indications, too, that the councillors attending the the meeting weren't anxious to revisit recurring questions concerning GRM. Councillor Don Whitlow said that while he was impressed by the initiative shown by the community in their strong numbers Thursday, he suggested their efforts should be put to better use. "If we could get all this kind of focus behind us about our health and education we'd have something. But you take something like this, where everybody just seems to come out and jump all over everybody, we're never going to get anything done like that. We've got to start working together." Councillor Nina Burnham also objected to what she apparently considered the adversarial nature of the meeting which she says pitted the community against council. Burnham asked how those at the meeting could be concerned with "finger pointing" so soon after the recent terrorist attacks in the United States. One community participant responded that "that's the most disrespectful piece of crap I've ever heard in my life." The GRM issues that seemed to carry the most momentum at Thursday's meeting were those not reliant on either a precise accounting of figures or the input of absentee council members. Among them was the recommendation made by KPMG in its audit of the GRM project last year that council establish clear conflict of interest guidelines. Chief Staats that the issue was already addressed before the audit, as council has had conflict of interest guidelines in place for several years. "If council has clear conflict of interest guidelines," asked Helen Miller, "why would the auditors recommend establishing clear conflict of interest guidelines?" Staats responded that he wasn't sure if KPMG had taken a look at band council's existing guidelines when they made their recommendation. Roberta Jamieson, who served as Ontario's first native ombudsman, noted that a large part of the problem between council and the community has to do with the fact the community feels very left in the dark when it comes to matters of council. "They are worried. They are concerned. There are allegations flying back and forth and there are not a lot of facts still, and that atmosphere continues when we are vague and have a lack of understanding." Although she said Thursday's meeting with council left many questions concerning GRM unresolved, Community Action Group spokesperson Audrey Hill said the community will continue to press the issues with council. She says concerned community members are invited to attend the group's weekly meetings at the Gathering Place on Seneca Road Wednesday nights. She added that the group will also organize a follow-up meeting with council within the next three to four weeks.