w > Ar: on arn ie ieny But this woman‘s faithâ€" was defecâ€" tive in two days. First, she thought «f Christ‘s healing power as a sort of charm. There was magic in the touch. Apparently she did not realize that _ His works of mercy were the overâ€" flowings of an infinitely loving heart. His will was in every cure; she was s cured because He willed it. True, He weacted so quickly on the touch of % faith that it seemed voluntary, but He soon showed that the virtue that went out from Him was under His é __control, and was nothing but His acâ€" «ion in response to her trust. She hadâ€"to learn this, and to see that inâ€" f stinctively He recognized the touch of f €expectancy. When he tried to single out the one whom He had healed, the «liscoplies remonstrated: "The crowd is touching you and pressing on you from every side; how can you ever find out ‘any particular one who : touched you?" They could not turn Him aside in this way. (Verses 31â€" & £2). He knew too well the difference ‘ between the push of a mob and the €ager touch of faith. Men may surâ€" round Him in â€" multitudes, but only those who seek His grace with singleâ€" mess of purpose really find it. There is no merit in being one of a mob around the Redeemer. We may press Tight upon Him and yet go away as empty as if we had never heard His â€"._ . _ fame. But those who claim, receive. This was this woman‘s case, and she had to learn that her cure was the ‘ gift of His love. THIG WEEKS 5. 5. LESGON WHATEATH GANGLAIM" Jairus‘ faith is of a very different quality from this woman‘s. He too comes to Christ as a last resort. It is only desperate need that drives this proud Jew forth and prostrates him at the feet of the Nazarene. (Verse 22). His own little daughter is at death‘s door. (Verse 23). And her dlanger breaks his heart. Christ reâ€" sponds promptly; sorrow like that never appealed to Him in vain. But Jairus‘ faith had a rocky road to travel. First came the interruption over thatâ€"woman, and the delay would be almost maddening to one so anx. ious. Néext, this obstacle is no sooner out of the way than the neighbors bring him word that his daughter is »dead, and Jairus is ready to give up altogether. But Christ will not let him give up. He encourages him to trust on. (Verse 36.) His help is «conditioned on Jairus‘ faith; thereâ€" fore Jairus must continue to believe. Thus He carries the sorrowing father along with Him until the girl is reâ€" stored to life. The woman‘s faith is so strong that it verges on superstition, and is unâ€" conscious of moral obligation; Christ prunes it and makes it fruitful. Jairus‘ faith is so weak that it cannot bear up under the strain; Christ helps him along and enables him to receive the gift. He knows the exact need in each case. He understands us through and through and will deal with each acâ€" cording to his condition, But the great lesson here is that we must hold fast our faith to the very end. We must never give up. This is the truth Paul finds illustratâ€" ed in Abraham‘s experiencte. Everyâ€" thing was against him; still he beâ€" lieved. The facts of nature made his expectation look ridiculous; but over against nature‘s impossibilities Abraâ€" ham set God‘s promise, knowing that God could do what He said He would do, no matter what nature said. (Roâ€" mans iv.: 22). This is God‘s challenge to enjoy her health in secret. The lesson Christ taught her was that her acceptance of that â€" gift necessitated acknowledgment of it for the sake of «others. (Verse 33.) Paul says in Romans x. : 9: "If thou shalt confess with thy mouth, the Lord Jesus, and ‘believe in thine heart that God raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." Faith and confession go hand in hand as the conditions of salvaâ€" tion. So many toâ€"day think that it is #ufficient to believe in secret. Now Christ requires public confession of our faith, and says emphatically that those who confess Him before men, He will confess before God, but those who deny Him before men, He will deny before God. (Matt. x.: 32â€"33). Jairus‘ faith is of a very different The second defect in her faith was due to her ignorance of the fact that successful faith involves moral obliâ€" €ation. Every gift has its correspondâ€" ing duty. Every blessing puts us in «lebt to God, and we must discharge the debt. We receive in order that we may serve. Now she thought that she could be healed and slip away _ This womah was sensitive about her malady. She had absolute confidence in Christ‘s power to heal, but she shrank from the gaze of the crowd, and the loud sensation that such a cure would create. A touch would be <sufficient, if only she could reach Him she could steal away with the blessing and escape all notoriety. Her #faith was superb, and it was well founded, as the event showed. The moment she touched His garment Christ healed her. This is the point we started with, namely, Christ‘s powâ€" er and willingness to help and heal are limited only by our capacity to reâ€" â€"ceive. To trust Him to the full means sto get the best Ho can give. © Two types of suppliant are brought before us in this lesson. This woman‘s faith was so strong that it verged on superstition. Jairus‘ faith was so weak that it could hardly worry. through, «even with Christ‘s help. It is interâ€" esting to see how Christ adapted Himâ€" wself to both cases. They are alike in â€"this, that both come to Christ as a last resort. When every other hope is cut off, they turn to Him. On the other hand,. Christ responds instantly to genuineâ€"belief and expecâ€" tancy. And the one who clings to Him through every discouragement and difficulty will receive His best. These things are brought out clearly n our lesson. _ Christ‘s action is limited by human weceptivity. Where we refuse to beâ€" lieve, He cannot fulfil His mission. God‘s gifts are conveyed through the human spirit, but that spirits must be willing to be a channel for the divine grace,. Unbelief or rebellion on our part stops the flow. _ March 10â€"Mark v.: 21â€"43. In a dark day of the present war a British paper ‘quoted Christ‘s ringâ€" ing words: ‘"He that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved.‘" Sucâ€" weess depends on seeing this thing through. To falter now in our belief in the righteousness of our cause and in the certainty of the ultimate triâ€" umph of the right, would be to forfeit everything. The faith that would seâ€" cure the highest blessing and that would achieve the greatest things must hold fast the promises right ‘through everything. Dishonesty is another charge to which he has left himself open. This was shown in his attempts to evade the payment to his wife of the aliâ€" mony which the court had granted her.. This he did by first illegally transferring his money to a company the management of which was comâ€" pletely under his own control,. and when that failed by himself removing from one state to another. But in none of these ways was he allowed to escape. He was forced to pay the alimony to his wife, the judge again censuring him for his conduct. Anothâ€" er indication of his questionable dealâ€" ing was known as "Miracle Wheat." This wheat was extensively advertisâ€" ed, at which Pastor Russell was an adept, and its price was fixed at sixty dollars a bushel. There were suffiâ€" Have we not experienced His genâ€" tle ministry? We launched out on a great faith venture. Our hopes were high; success was near and would be wonderful: But soon storms broke over us; enemies beset us; the voyage was longer and harder than > we thought. Then we felt Christ by our side, encouraging us to continue in faith, and saying: "Be not afraid; only believe." Let us not disappoint Him. Trust through to the end. He will never fail. 2 We must never let go. If God has promised He is sure to fulfil. The writer to the Hebrews rings the changes on this need of constancy. "‘Christ‘s house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto theâ€"end.‘" (Heb. iil.: 6.) The point of the epistle is that those who continue steadfast in theif faith, no matter what the cost, and only those, shall attain. Faith‘s roadâ€" is never easy. There are many delays;â€"often it leads through sufferâ€" ing. But, as in Jairus‘ case, Christ‘s blessing depends on our continuing to trust. â€" O Ceatmenes to us now. Believe through to the end. His domestic relations furnish the ground for a strong indictment against. Pastor Russell. These were such that his wife, who on his own evidence was a woman of excellent Christian character, was forced to seek judicial separation from him. This was granted by one court, and on appeal to a higher court was conâ€" firmed, the judge at the same time severely censuring Pastor Russell for his conduct, which he characterized as ‘"insulting," "domineering" and "overâ€" bearing" to a degree which made life intolerable to a sensitive Christian woman. What was Pastor Russell‘s Characâ€" ter? In abnswering this question I recognize the seriousness of saying anything that would reflect on the character of another. But certain facts have come out in court trials, and in other ways, that fully justify a public reference to them. At the outbreak of the war, with the shrewdness that always characâ€" terized him, he saw the possibility of turning it to account in furthering his propaganda. He assumed an attitude that could only be interpreted as being proâ€"German. He charged his followâ€" ers not to enlist for military service in _the cause of Britain and her allies, and for their following his direction and refusing to.comply with the Miliâ€" tary Service Act, some of them in Canada are now undergoing terms in gaol. Because of his attitude he was refused admission into Canada to deâ€" liver any public addresses. On severâ€" al occasions when he attempted it he was turned back. If he had lived till the United States had entered the war his attitude would have got him into serious trouble in his own country, if indeed it would not have deprived him of his liberty. His previous death, however, saved him from such a posâ€" sibility. His recent book, "The Finâ€" ished Mystery," with the other Rusâ€" sellite publications, are now forbidden entrance into Canada on account of their seditious statements, and even their possession incurs very serious penalties. â€" Who was Pastor Russell?â€" But litâ€" tle seems to be known about his parâ€" entage or early. life. We first find him conducting a clothing store in the city of Allegany, Pa. In business he seems to have been successful, as he â€"ultimately had five of these under his _control. We have no account ‘of his ever having had any connection with any Christian Church. After a time he started to deliver addresses, in which he attacked the orthodox Chrisâ€" tian faith, at the same time advocatâ€" ing some old heresies which he resurâ€" rected from the past. We have alâ€" ways with us a class of persons with sufficiently morbid appetite torelish that kind of religious diet, so we need not be surprised that he found eager listeners. In this he saw the possiâ€" bility of a new line of activity, so he disposed of his stores and started a publishing establishment. He wrote, or had written (for we have absolute proofâ€" that he was incapable of writâ€" ing all himself), a series of books to which he gave the general title of ‘"Studies in the Scriptures," each book having a subâ€"title. These found a large sale through persistent agents, many people not knowing what they were buying, as they were never ofâ€" fered as Russell‘s books, but always as books explaining the scriptures. Besides this, Pastor Russell carried on a propaganda in which he adverâ€" tised himself as no other man has ever had the effrontery to do. But because Barnum‘s dictum is still true, that "people like to be fooled," he succeeded... By paying for it he had his sermons extensively published, esâ€" pecially in local papers. In these serâ€" mons, with much that was unobjecâ€" tionable, he skilfully mixed his religâ€" ious poison, so that many unsuspectâ€" ing victims swallowed it without deâ€" tection. He travelled extensively and thus he became widely known and, with the class to which I have referâ€" red, quite popular. The following is the substance of an address given by the Rev. J. W. Stewâ€" art in the Weston Methodist Church on the evening of Feb. 24, 1918: Text II. Peter 2: 1â€"2. I have made it the rule in my ministry never to speak against other Christian churchâ€" es, with all of which I desire to be on the most friendly relations. In what I am about to say I am not violating that rule, because Russelism is not Christian, as Pastor Russell in his published teaching denies the very foundation of our Christian faith â€" the Divinity of Christ and his resurâ€" rection from the dead, and it makes no pretense of evangelism, but is conâ€" fessedly a purely proselytizing agency. Their work is not to get people saved, but to get saved people out of the churches. ‘‘To gather out the elect" is the less offensive way in which they express it. A few questions will call out what I wish to say. â€" PASTOR RUSSELL AND HIS TEACHING Continent he completely refuted the statements of Pastor Russell, and in a personal interview Russell admitted to him that his tour was very hurried. He had largely made the tour of the East on the same ship, stopping only at ports long enough for the vessel to discharge and receive cargo. Only in two places on the whole tour had he spent as much time as a week, and one of those places was London. He had met only two missionaries and he didn‘t even interview them with regard to their work. And yet he had the effrontery to say that the people in the lands that he visited had received more gospel through his sermons during that flying tour than they had ever before beard, â€"â€"Thus, without any regard for truth or honâ€" esty, he carried out a preconceived purpose to discredit the work of such men as Carey and Judson and Morriâ€" son and Taylor and Thoburn and many others, through whom not only thousands, but hundreds of thousands, in those very lands, were led to beâ€" come devoted followers of Christ. The work of men, to whose memories it is an insult to mention their names in connection with Pastor Russell, he unblushingly held up to ridicule. And yet a man of whom such things can be saidâ€"a man proved to be an absoâ€" lute stranger to honesty and truthfulâ€" ness, is being received by many with open arms as being a safe religious teacher and guide, although he de-( nies the teaching of Christ and his apostles and ridicules the faith that made a thousand martyrs. What was the teaching of. Pastor Russell? In this there was nothing particularly new., It was simply a gathering up of a lot of old heresies that had long ago been discredited. His originality, however, was shown in his bringing so many of these together and formingâ€"that religious blend to which he gave the euphoneous name of "Millenial Dawn." One point in his teaching to which he gave great prominence is Christ‘s second coming. This, he declared, took place in 1874, but He would not be manifested until October, 1914.. This became of great service to Pastor Russell, as it was made the ground for an appeal for One thing more must be told. A few years ago Pastor Russell proposâ€" ed a world tour, one object being the study at first hand of the work the Christian ‘churches professed to be doing in their missionary operations. The tour was advertised months in advance. During its progress glowing reports of its success were kept beâ€" fore the public. The acclaim with which he was everywhere received was a prominent feature of these reâ€" ports. It was pricked the bubble when it was later discovered that some of the places thus reported were never reached at all. On his return a great meeting was held in the Hipâ€" podrome in New York to receive Pasâ€" tor Russell‘s report on the work of Christian Missions.. His report was that the mission work of the churches was a complete failure. Everywhere this was apparent. The missionaries themselves were completely discourâ€" aged and many of them were continuâ€" ing their work only because they were well paid for it. This report was pubâ€" lished and widely circulated in Rusâ€" sell‘s paper, "The Watch â€" Tower." There was one man, however, who was prepared to meet this selfâ€"apâ€" pointed investigator of Missions, Mr. W. T. Ellis, editor of "The Continent." He had, as a layman, studied the question of missions, and travelled through mission fields for that purâ€" pose. In a series of articles in The Since that time the Rev. J. J. Ross, a Baptist minister, formerly of Toâ€" ronto, more recently of Hamilton, afâ€" ter making a study â€"of Russelism, wrote a pamphlet exposing its false and misleading teaching. Pastor Rusâ€" sell at once. instituted _ proceedings against Mr. Ross for criminal libel. When, after considerable delay in getâ€" ting Pastor Russell to come to Canâ€" adaâ€"to prosecute, it came before the court, he took the witness stand as prosecutor.. Soon he came under the fire of a hot crossâ€"examination by Lynch Staunton, counsel for the deâ€" fense, Amongst other questions,. in answering which he failed to impress the court with his honesty and truthâ€" fulness, he was asked if he underâ€" stood Hebrew and Greek, the original languages in which the Scriptures were written. To this he unhesitatâ€" ingly replied in the affirmative, statâ€" ing that was the reason he was able to give to the scriptures their proper interpretation. ‘"You can read the Greek then?" said the lawyer. "Cerâ€" tainly," was the positive reply. The lawyer handed him a Greek Testaâ€" ment, saying as he did so: "Will you point out the letters of! the Greek alphabet?" After fumbling the leaves for a minute he was compelled to acknowledga that he _didn‘t know them. Is anything more needed to prove that Pastor Russell was absoâ€" lutely regardless of veracity ? But another charge to which Pastor Russell left himself open was falseâ€" hood of the most glaring character. A few years ago the "Brooklyn Eagle" in a published article charged him with dishonest dealing in certain tranâ€" sactions, amongst them being his conâ€" nection with a questionable company known as ‘"The United States Investâ€" ment Company." He instituted proâ€" ceedings against ‘"The Eagle" for libel, claiming damages of $100,000. When it came to trial he was asked if the charges made by The Eagle were corâ€" rect, and to every one of them he gave the most positive denial. He stated that he knew nothing about the Unitâ€" ed ‘States Investment Company, that he had no.connection with it directly or indirectly, and was in no way reâ€" sponsible for its doings. The Eagle had the charter of the company proâ€" duced and put in evidence. That charter showed that the United States Investment Company was composed of three men, John A. Bohnet, Ernest C. Hesminges and Chas. T. Russell, the last named being the manager. It further showed that 1,000 shares of stock had been issued. Of these Jno. A. Hohnet held 5 shares, Ernest C. Henninges held 5, while Chas. T. Russell (Pastor Russell) held 990 shares. And yet ho had just stated before the court that he had no conâ€" nection whatever with the company. Needless to say that his suit against The Eagle failed, and instead of colâ€" lecting $100,000 damages he left that court having damaged his own charâ€" acter beyond repair. cient dupes to buy the wheat with the idea that it was going to revoluâ€" tionize wheat production. One season was sufficient to prove that this exâ€" pectation was groundless. Then, as was only natural, there was bitter complaint. To this Pastor Russell coollyâ€"replied that he hadn‘t guaranâ€" teed any such result, and the purâ€" chasers themselves took the risk. And thus he took one dollar a pound for ‘"Miracle Wheat," knowing that the people who invested in it were being deceived. THE TIMES & GUIDE, WESTON, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6TH, 1918 Report of. Bala Avenue School, Mt. Dennis, February. Form IV.â€"Margarâ€" et Mewhort, Edith . Moore, Norma Baggs, Grace Miller and Marion Mcâ€" Eachern. Form III. §r.â€"Harry Burâ€" lington, Dora Easto, Dora Chilyers, Thelma Mainprize and Queenie Chapâ€" pell.â€" Form HI. Jr.â€"Harold. Davis, Louie Ringland, Mary Lee, Daniel Mewhort, Grace Chantler. Form II. Sr.â€"Willie Greayer, Billie Beardall, Eddie Baggs, George Dover, and Ivy Wiltshire. Form II. Jr.â€"Eldon Trimâ€" ble, Tom Gurr, John Mewhort, Rusâ€" sel Garrison and Ernest â€" Burlington. Form I. Sr.â€"Irla Keating, Dorothy Pawley, Edwin Moore, Robert Clarke, and Jas. Moore. Form I. Jr.â€"Lilian Tibble, Lorne Phillips, . Doris Karn, Marjorie Duggan and Charles Mount. Sr. Primaryâ€"Katherine Rigglesford, Douglas Marshall, Rosie Cooke, Gladâ€" ys Abbott, George Warn. Jr. Primary â€"Alfred Chilvyers, Albert Mason, Heâ€" len Hibbert, Catharine Mewhort, Jimâ€" my Windeatt, and â€" Charlie Morden. No. on roll, 252; aggregate attendance, 3402; average attendance, 191. The Next of Kin. By Nellie McClung, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Comâ€" pany. $1.25. The sixteen brief tales in this book are bound together by the same thing which draws close the people who fiâ€" gure in themâ€"the war. For the auâ€" thor is concerned with the way in which war, and the sacrifices made for it, the burdens borne in it, touchâ€" es those whom she knows best, the women and children of Canada. With few exceptions these are stories of women who have given up their sons, of others who are widowed, because they cherish the idea of the British Empire, and are ready to give bread and blood "the sacrament of empire" to save it. But though the book is naturally full of the tragedyâ€"of war, it is reâ€" lieved by the author‘s nice sense of humor and by the thread of suffrage argument running boldly throughâ€"it. The Nextâ€"of Kin is among the new books just listed in the Weston pubâ€" lic library. This review is clipped from The New York Times Book Review. I close with a quotation from Dr. Moorehead, "Suchâ€" is the Millenial Dawn of C. T. Russellâ€"a mixture of Unitarianism, Universalism, Second Probation, Restorationism, Annihilaâ€" tionism, with the Swedenborgian meâ€" thod of exegesis. Let the reader reâ€" member that imposition is not exposiâ€" tion or is eisegesis exegesis. Mr. Russell employs both; he imposes upâ€" on Scripture his own views and reads into it that which never entered the mind of the inspired writer. May God in his infinite mercy preserve his people from being deceived and beâ€" trayed by this counterfeit of Christiâ€" anity. â€"It should be called not "Millenâ€" ial Dawn," but Midnight Darkness." These are but a few of the vagarâ€" ies of Pastor Russell‘s teaching, which in his arrogance he believed would displace all previous Scripture interâ€" pretation and overthrow all other acâ€" cepted theological beliefs, disintegratâ€" ing the existing Christian churches till they would crumble and decay and Russellism would be supreme in the religious world. 2 But the crowning heresy in Pastor Russell‘s teaching, which, in view of the clear teaching of the Gospels, is nothing less than / blasphemy in his practical annihilation of Christ. He absolutelyâ€"denies his divinity. He had no preâ€"existence before he was born into the world and while he was in the world he lived a purely human life. He denies his resurrectionâ€"says we don‘t know what became of his body that disappeared from the sepulchre, "It was probably decomposed into its original gases," The only resurrecâ€" tion was that of Christ‘s spirit (whatâ€" ever that may mean, for spirit can‘t die) and his continued life since is purely divine, the human being enâ€" tirely eliminated from it. What the apostles saw on the Mount of Ascenâ€" sion was not the body of Christ goâ€" ing up, but only an apparition. The Christ of Russellism was not a Saviour and could no more be a Saviour from sin than Pastor Russell himself could be. Then this is supplemented with the ‘doctrine of annihilation. Those who do not wish to take advantage of that final chance for salvation simply go out of existence. They are forever extinet. And of course that means that there is no hell. That is made prominent in the teaching of Russellâ€" ism. Pastor Russell said "There is no hell.‘" â€" Christ said, ‘"In hell he lifted up his eyes, being in torment.‘" And again Christ said "These shall go away into everlasting punishment." Amongst the Russell teaching we find that of a second probation.. All who are not saved in this life will have the opportunity of being saved after death. And the more wicked they have been in this life, the more likely will they embrace that afterâ€" death opportunity. This without a word of Scripture to support it, while the whole of Scripture teaching is against it. \ Another of Russell‘s heretical teachâ€" ings is that the spirit of man has no conscious existence between death and the resurrection.. This is absoluve conâ€" tradiction to the Scripture, which says of death, "Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return to God who gave it." Eecel. 12:7. Also contradicting the words of Christ to the dying thief on the cross, ‘"Toâ€"day shalt thou be with me in parâ€" adise."" Laitke 23:43. One of Pastor Russell‘s arrogant asâ€" sumptions is that his books, "Studies in the Scriptures," are equal or suâ€" perior to the Bible itself. His actuâ€" al statement is this: ‘"If the six volâ€" umes of ‘Scripture Studies‘ are pracâ€" tically the Bible, topically arranged, with Bible proof text given, we might not improperly name the volumes ‘The Bible in an arranged form,‘ that is to say, they are not merely comments on the Bible, but they are practically the Bible itself." And he goes on to say that it is saferâ€"to study his books withâ€" out the Bible, than to study the Bible without his books. There‘s not an inâ€" spired scripture. writer who would dare to make such an assertion. But Pastor Russell‘s dupes accept from him such blasphemy without acresentâ€" ment. funds to spread the "Good News." However, as 1914 approached he beâ€" came less confident that his predicâ€" tion would be fulfilled.. There might be reasons for its postponment. The time came and passed without any indication of the predicted manifestaâ€" tion. And yet his followers go on eviâ€" dently with as much confidence in his leadership as if he had never made that false prediction. _ ~ THE NEXT OF KIN SCHOOL REPORTS S |T PRICK® _ _ . / IS IT QUALITY > _ IS IT QUANTITY > Too much attention cannot be paid to the regulations governing this corâ€" respondence, as any item which conâ€" travenes these regulations in any way will not be transmitted. All enquiries on this subject are to be made to Thos. Cookâ€"& Son, 530 St. Catharine Street West, Montreal, who will furnish a copy of the regulations to be observed in sending such correâ€" spondence. When writing Thos. Cook & Son a stamped, addressed envelope must be.enclosed if a reply is desired. This amount is to be remitted by means of a Postal Note, together with the letter which is to be forwarded, to Thos. Cook & Son, 530 St. Catharâ€" ine Street West, Montreal, in accordâ€" ance with the instructions which may be obtained on application from Thos. Cook & Son. 4. Having received a letter from the Director of Canadian Chaplain Serâ€" vices to the effect that a Kit Store at Victoria Station, London, would minister to the sick and wounded, as well as to others, the Society decided to erect one at aâ€"cost of $1150. Cross and advise fully at once to what extent you can use money and supâ€" plies. Ifâ€"good can be done will make liberal grants to allies and also purâ€" chase supplies in England and here. Will coâ€"operate in every way to meet expected demands. Executive preparâ€" ed to spend whatever amount necesâ€" sary. People of Canada will support generously. § "MARSHALL.*" 2. The Society has received a cable from the president of the Ladies‘ Emergency Corps of the Navy League, London, Asking for funds to provide food for Royal Navy Prisoners in Gerâ€" many, Austria and Turkey. The Soâ€" ciety has, accordingly, made an iniâ€" tial donation of $5,000. 3. The Society has approved of the erection of a gymnasium at Granville Canadian Hospital, Buxton. CORRESPONDENCE RATES INTO ENEMY TERRITORY CABLE TO CANADIAN RED _ CROSS SOCIETY, LONDON ‘"‘Executive impressed with probaâ€" bility of enormous demands due to possible activities. Consult British Red 5. The Society approved of the exâ€" penditure of $1250 for a portable fumigator for Corps Restâ€" Station, France. It has been found that the charge previously stipulated (25c) for the forwarding of correspondence from Canada to enemy and enemy occupied territory through the medium of Thos. Cook & Son, Montreal, does not cover the cost of such transmission, and in future the charge for forwarding such correspondence will be 35c per letter. 6. The Society has rented a hotel in Boulogne at a rental of $800 per month for a Rest Home for nurses passing through Boulogne. Single Copies of The TIMES & GUIDE are on sale at 3c per copy in the following places MOUNT DENNIS W. W. COOK, corner Buttonwood and Weston Road. HODGSON, the Shoe Man, 1050 Weston Road. BALFOUR, the Druggist, 1030 Weston Road. Phone 175. Church Street, Weston C. DANKERT, Supt. WM. BARRATT, M ITHEâ€"POSTE OFFRIGE. SHAW‘S, Main Street, Refreshment Parlors. W. J. INCH, Main Street, Druggist. D. EAMPBELL, Main Street, Druggist. Or â€" THE FIMES & GUIDE OFFICE: R. M. COULTER, Deputy Postmaster General NOTICE ! All three can be had at the CANADA LUMBER COMPANY‘S YARDS, WESTON. Lumber, Trimming, Doors, Columns, Flooring, Roofings, etc., at all prices. Sold by the car or in small lots. Wé can supply all your requirements. Write or telephone and we will call. TXE GANADA LUMBER 60. LTD. WESTON M. G. WARDELL, Prop. Phone Junction 190 W A R DE L LC S 28992 Dundas St. S HE P P A R DC‘ S T he Wardell Monumental Works WM. BARRATT, Manager W. J. SHEPPARD 2696 Dundas Street and 10 Weston Road WEST TORONTO Only the Finest & Richest An Excellent Selection of SILVER TEA SERVICES CUT GLASS BERRY s BOWLS CUT GLASS WATER BOTTLES CUT GLASS CREAM AND SUGAR CUT GLASS TUMBLERS Issuer of Marriage Licenses Fill Your Cabinet With C. W. WARDELL, Mgr. Opp. C.P.R. Station for this fall‘s erecâ€" tion. . These cannot be duplicated till afâ€" ter the war. We have also a choice selection of We have been forâ€" tunate in securing some choice â€" Canadian and American Granites & Marbles TORONTO scoTCH GRANITES PAGE THREE Ass x2 2s E h: it