mam, in this Division, that Mr. Carling, the new Receiver General, wan elected hyac. cm for London; and Hon 1. 3. Bo- binson, President of the Council, dead £0: Tom» by a majority of 527 over his oppo- nent, Mayor Bowes. The total votes cast veto: F0: Robinson, L071 ; (0: Bowen. 544â€" mly two mono. The public my imftom the foregoing Annals Moxmv, May, 1862. Bates. ï¬ck- wéï¬cldm-u‘l‘he present numhorof this ur'nl {any equals any fen-es. The content- m 5 ï¬che“ that must recommend them to all. Thu .9.“ «of lieu-try wait!) in thin woxk thonld 2994:: it indiflmmblo in every houeebolcl. how popular the Opposition in in the il-une: diam locality of its leaders». Whydid not Goo. more influence than heretofore, and conse- quentiy be in a' better position to further the internal of his constituents, and the Province at large. Hie a’rrival created quite a comma. tion wrong the Grits, and the reception which be everywhere met with rather surprised them, and caused their (aces to elongate consideraâ€" bly. One of the prominent men of our vii- Inge, rho Inpponed Mr. Patton it the last election, but has since turned renegade, (in hopea. Imam, of gettinga share at the loaves and ï¬shes when the Grits get in pawn†chalked any and did not show hint-elf on the unrest, ail thetirne Mr. Patton m in the vii. lmâ€"vhmcï¬, .09 400%. '9 9W0 man than “ William the mwfazaid "spread *7. u 010 moon of the street: and grime y told his rumba (I) that he had thrice,.dmipg that gentleman’t nay, endeavored m obtain av Indiana! '5â€! him (I): rhc purpose of hearing} “on! in bad 'gionged, -vâ€" w“ m be had wronged, and deserted vith- a nun. No sooner, haWevef, hauling. bgcmggpn egg! 137 moi; But for all this, Mr. McMurrich still gives himself out the same unsullied patriotâ€"the same dear friend of the North-Westâ€"that he was at the beginning of the unlucky ‘ventute. He is anxious to get into the Legislative- Council to put that half. of . the continent-in order. But this is not all. Mr. McMurrich has a little bill against the government, of which he is very desirous to get payment,â€" He and his associates claim thirtyâ€"three thousand seven hundred and twenty-ï¬ve dol- lars, on a balance for the “construct-ion of “ roads and otherwise opening up the line of “ communication between Fort William and: “ the Red River settlement.†We may form some opinion of the nature of this claim from the fact that the government refused to ad;- vance $10,000â€"less than a third of the amount sought to be obtainedâ€"unlessMessrs Lewis Moï¬'at and McMurrich would sign a bond binding them in the penalty of. $20.0“) to return any balance this ten thousand dol- lars may leave in favor of the government} when a ï¬nal settlement is made. And the! .did sign the bond on the 15!!! and. 16th inch} In this document we resdthat Messrs “hwig f‘ Mofl'at and John McMurriclt have made... “ claim upon. thé Provincial 0078mean “ Canada for: monoyiex‘pended 1’14th and “those assomatcd With them, in the construc- I have been so much struck toâ€"day with a case of post mortem justice, that I cannot re. {rain from narrating it in the hope that some living miner may lay the lesson to heart.â€" The subject of the following obituary was the son of a poor wood-chopper, and he died in the possession of $10,000,000. The London journals, it seams, are not-afraid to engrave, the truth, on a man’s tombstone. The Ship- ping and mercantile interests were 'deeply shocked to learn of the sudden decease of I Mr. Duncan Dunbar, the well#known ship owner and merchant. His death took place this morning just before leaving†home for business, at the moment When his servant was leaving home for business, at the mo- ment when-his some“. helping him on With his coat. .Mr. Dunbar was the owner of ï¬fty-two vessels, Iohiefly'o’f a large size, and his property ‘of every descri tion is roughly calculated at £2,000,000 ster ing. He was a merchant as well as a ship owner, a speculg- tor en the ‘Stdek Exchange as well as in for. eign and colonial produce; a director in seve- ral public; joint companies; aman ï¬rm and severe, just and honorable, paying to the ut- mos‘bflrthing and exacting the me. With; all his wealth, he is not known to have con- trited to charitable 7 objects- Where _,rnoney ,wm’ be made“ he was the {oremrsbbm1 limehh reads much 110' 1051 much. ~ " h! 096'“ Larticle of rice alone, he some few years ago, lest£100,v000,lfandthemarket for.that pro-, duce has never been the same as it used to be since he went into it. He was induced r931410 NU’I‘ICE jahiereby given that the ' ‘Proton Council will-meet“: "Comic! Ro- fision, at the house of John Anderson, Lot 29, 0110. 10, or} Thursday the 22041 day of May next. JOHN YERT,‘CLnx. l. chasing or negociating two Notes of Hand in favor-of Thomas Moflatt against. John Sin, {3: the. sum of $55 and $12 respective] ;. also a Note of Band for $16 against John Mc audio in favor of Thomas Mofl'att, as said Noteshave boon paid. - -. THOMAS MOFFATT. """ â€â€œ5â€â€œâ€œ' "“‘ 0‘“ “'2" -' .- strï¬glgthg .giaog. M71811!“ mll ha mum in the aft of phctimi singing. ‘- Durham, 7th April, 1862. 1233!. THE public are hereby cautioned against pur- chasing or negociating two Notes of 339;! ° "‘éOURT OF Rm Glcnelg, April 24, 1862. Normanby, 23rd April, 1862. Frown: April 3131; 1333 m; QRGANIST St. John’s Church, I Englandlwill gjve {uiï¬on 9n the}: mm», mar, MEmDEON. _ MRS. ORG]! ARD LOST NOTES. - “ ' 115:3in. 175:3.