h years the Clergy of the Episcopal Church have more than doubled in this country. In the same time the number of communicsnts has more than quadrupled.†The Independent on the numerical gains of the Church has these remarks :~-H The ï¬gures which we present should give some bodies of Christians greet searchings of heart. To keep up with growth of, p0pulation, the Presbyterian Church North, should gain 12.000 members. It has gained 3.000. The Reformed should have gained nearly 2,000; it has lost 20 members. On the other hand the Cumberland Presbyterian should have gained 2,500, but it has really gained 6,869. The Episcopal- ians should have gained 8.000, but they have gained 20.846. Such facts show where active work has been ex- . Md", . With this brief notice of the state i “ public mind. I proceed to oler arguments in favor oi the use the Presbyterian Church is almost stationary. It requires close calcu- lation to show that she is even hold- in; her own." I maylhe permitted to digress a little by adding the re- .arlrs of the Christian World (Prea- hyterian) on the progress of the Episcopal Church :-“ The Episcopal Church is, in many respects, one o! the leading Churches of the land. It» has great wealth and influence. 0! late years it claims to have made re- marhable progress. especially in the large cities. and spreading itself over the land. It has manifested a very considerable missionary spirit within a year or two. It has drawn many of its ministers from the ranks of -AL __ been drawn away merely by the an. perior attractiona of ita cultue. The tracks are all one way. Look through any circle of your acquaintanceohip. and count up the Presbyterian iam- ilieain which one, two or more lambs have strayed into the Biahop'e fold. It is very largely due to this iact that of all the aecta in the United Siatee. the Anglican ia growing the most rapidly at the present time. It in? {arming new congregationa, and or- ganising new dioeeaoa with-extraord- inary rapidity. On the other hand inn Pastor in the land but. can testify to such losses, The Anglican Church has been largely recruited from our renks. There ere many thoueend in Chet Church et present. who heve ed in against all Forms of Prayer.â€" Tne general feeling soon became tra- ditional among large sections of the people. that no prayer could be ac- ceptable to God, which was thought out carefully and prepared before hand. However, many of their spir- itual watchmen now have sagacity enough to perceive, that this grow- ing use of, and love for, Liturgical Worship. is something more than the mere fact which lies upon the surface. It means that there a strong 3 current in the public mind, setting in a particular direction, Professor Hopkins of the Presbyterian Semin- ary at Auburn. in an article advising the adoption of Liturgical worship. remarks :--“ A very large number of the children of Presbyterian families. and many of the cultivated and taste- ful of our members have sought a more cheerful. more varied, more snnpsthic service in another com- munion. There is not a Presbyter- or according to the Revision of the “'eattninister lï¬vines,†" Liturgia Ext-inmate,†etc. A 8. rather re- luctantly admits that the Presbyter- ians in Canada are quietly feeling their way in the same direction. “’6 ï¬nd a similar state of things in other countries. but particularly so in Scot- land, where many of the Churches vie with the most advanced Episcop- alians. It is evident that many of their ministers, and multitudes of their people are unqualiï¬edly in fav- or of Liturgical Forms. And by 1 this change they condemn their fore- fathers for all their violent and per- secuting opposition to Liturgies. The sins of their forefathers are vis- ited upon them in depriving them of the use and advantages of a Scriptur- al Liturgy. No doubt, many of them now realize this intensely. The hit- ter old Puritan spirit was rapidly passing away when the new spirit of wild enthusiasm which accompanied early Methodist successes revived it, and spread it more generally among the masses. This new teaching de- clared as from the housetopa. that men could only pray with the Spirit, when they poured out extemporane- ously the thoughts and feelings. which it was assured. that the Spirit of God was then awakening in their hearts. Thus exrempore prayer be- came the rule among these people. Liturgical forms were banished, and . severely denounced. Many were the . stupid, course jokes that were indulg- t Won 0! P hone bitte Inch the! actic flies. put“ With: bee n ical ( "e a Dlun Sillsâ€"'1 propose in this letter to present briefly n few of the argu- mnte which we use in favor of the ï¬le of Liturgiee in the Public Wor- ship of Almighty God, after having ï¬rst considered some of the indica- tions on the question chiefly in Pres- byterian strongholds. WILL IT EVER END? )l‘ â€9969 Ill! last ' signiï¬cant fact that It few years there has 3 outside of the Histor- >f Christendomâ€"which ical in their mode of ncreased use of Forms in: we regret that this as stirred up again. in the old violent and m to the devout use of The Presbyterians in tea have taken formal restoration of Litur- their leading divines 9 years agarâ€"â€The; ook of Common Pray-l > the Revision of the Divines,†“Liturgiaf I As we follow down the history of the peOple, we ï¬nd constant proofs of prescribed Forms of devotion. Thus, at the dedication of King Sol- omon’s Temple. the inimitable Ser- tvice there used has been handed tldovlrn. and employed thousands of itimes since, at the consecration of . houses of prayer in Christian lands. . {And, after the Jews became estab- J lished in their land, we have no room 3 for doubt in what manner their pub- lic Service was conducted. Jewish ,‘ Rabbis inform us, that it was com- ’ posed of sacriï¬ces, liturgical compos- ,' ition. and Psalms, and we have still E preserved and handed down the serv- ices then employed. That Temple Service was subsequently remodelled by King Hezekiah ('2 Chron. 29-30.) and, as the Jews tell us, additions were made to it subsequently by Ezra. A leasned Rabbi says : “ Ezra com- posed these ltï¬iorms of prayer. which were enjoined by the Great Council, that every man might have them in * his mouth, and be perfect in them. ‘ and that thereby the prayers of the 3 rude and ignorant might be as com- ‘ ptete as those of a more eloquent ‘ tongue. And then after stating the 1 customs which prevailed. that the ' peeple should say “Amen †at the 4 Just before Moses’ deeth he teught st God’s commend. e Song to the children of Isreel. commemorative of God’s mercies, end which they. end their seed eiter them, were required to preserve for religious uses. For es Bishop Petrick observes " The Jews sey. thet et the time of this ed- ditionel secriï¬oe. in the morning of the Sebheth, they seng et the Tem- ple the Song of Moses. dividing it into six perts, end singing one pert every Sebbeth, so thet in six weeks they hed ï¬nished it, end then hegen egein. And et the evening Secriï¬ce, they seng thet song of His (Ex. 15,) et which time the priests sounded the trumpets three times more then they did et the ordinery songs.†So also ct the offering of the ï¬rst fruits, the Israelite was required to repeat a certain form of words when he brought the basket to the priest; words which cal led to mind the good- ness of the Lord to Israel in past due." Dent. 26; 1-11. At the expiation for uncertain murder, the elders of that city next unto the slain man, were required to say over the heifer slain. these pre- scribed words. “ Our hands have not shed this blood. neither have our eyes seen it. Be merciful, OGod, unto Thy people,"etc., Dent. 21 : 7-8 ing unto them. The Lord bless thee and keep thee; the Lord make His face to shine upon thee, and be gra- cious unto thee; the Lord lift up His countenance upon thee, and give thee peace, Num. 6 : 22-6.†So also, when the Tabernacle had been erected, and the people gathered together unto it, to bring their sac- riï¬ces, a particular form was pre- scribed. in which to bless the peOple as they departed : " The Lord spake unto Moses, saying, speak unto Aaron and his sons. saying, on this wise ye shalLbless the children of Israel, say- be the Lord. let. {hot-glory of His Kingdom be forever.†While the Israelites were in the wilderness, every part of their wor- ship was arranged by Divine com- l mand, with surprising particularity ; nothing was left to impulse and cap- rice. Thus, when the High Priest sent the scape-goat into the Wilder- ness, and laid “ both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and con- fessed over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel. and all their transgressions in all their lives, put- ting them upon the head of the goat (Lev. 16-21 ) the form to be used by the High Priest was exactly pre- scribed, and the people fell down upon their faces, saying: " Blessed Thus. immediately after the pass- age of the Red Sea. we ï¬nd Israel commemmorating that 'great deln e1 ance in a Sacred Song. recorded 1n t.11e 15th chapter of Exodus. In coni- gparing the first and twenty ï¬rst ver- see of that chapter, we ï¬nd that 1t was recited responsively, ° the people reciting the Song, and Miriam. the p1ophetess, and her companions, re- {peating this chorus at intervals-- ‘ “ Sing ye to the Lord, for He bath 1 triumphed gloriously , the horse and his rider hath He thrown into the {Sea †Keeble on a note on Hooker E. _P. Bk. V. chap. 211. noterays: “ The Song of Moses occurs in the Jewish Morning Service, both of Rome, Germany and Spain, and is found in several of the old Liturgies of the Arabic Christians; whomay be supposed to have retained it. out of the Jewish Service,†Sacriï¬ces can be accepted. Now the mode of worship observed by the Jews at the command of God, was af- ter a. prescribed Form. The main characteriscics and the great ends of Public Worship are the same in all ages. In its essential features it )8 nm distinctively Jew- ish or Christian. There is always the same God of love and justice to adore, the same sacriï¬ce of grateful and contrite hearts to present. and the same Mediatorial Ofï¬ce of Christ, through which alone our unworthy l 1. The Holy Scriptures sanction the use of Liturgies in Public Wor- ship. and they sanction no other mode of Public Worship. If proofs be produced to sustain these two pos- itions then I may regard A. B’s ques- tion re the Liturgy as satisfactorily answered-«and he will not advocate that Liturgical W'orship should be restricted to “simple honest folk,†“ in districts and unsettled commun- ities. in which there is no settled paStor, and in which the services are conducted by ordinary unlette red people.†of Liturgies in the Public Worship of Almighty God. science of every humble Christian. It is also worthy of remark, that even this Prayer was not an original composition, framed for the occasion ; -â€"but a grouping IOgether of sent- ences all derived from the Jewish Liturgy, which was familiar to our Saviour and his disciples. The fol. lowing are the expression! taken from the Jewish Liturgy from which the Lord’s Prayer was formed. or complied: “ Our Father which art in heaven, be gracious unto us, oh Lord our God, hallowed be Thy Name, and let the remembrance of Thee be glari. fled in heaven above, and Upon earth here below. Let Thy Kin ' over us now and forever. The holy men of old said, remit and forgive unto all men, whatever they have done against me. And lead no net .â€" 'vvv-v- “ Lord. teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples.†This request also strengthens my argument, by leading us to infer that John Baptist had given his disciples “ A Form of Prayer,†as it was for such a purpose that the disciples of Christ now came to Him. The conduct of our Saviour, in View of that request, deserves the% closest attention. He was now establishing a principle; He was in- stituting a precedent; He was acting as in the very presence of countless millions of His disciples, till the res- , urrection morning; He was acting, not capriciously, but as an All-wise God and Lawgiver. Accustomed Himself to Liturgical Worthip for 20 years, in His attendance upon the Jewish Service, He now enjoins the same mode of worship upon His own disciples. His answer was: “ When ye pray. say " Our Father, etc." It is not merely permissive, it is a posi- tive command, binding on the con- , His disciples, as it sppesrs, desir- ing to worship as Christians, and yet feeling the want of instruction how to conduct their devotions, came to their ‘Msster with this petition: My next argument in favor of Liturgies. is drawn from the practice and precept of our Blessed Lord Himself. I dwelt longer upon the previous argument. because of its bearing upon that now to be oflered. For, the fact that while He remained on earth, He was constant in His at-‘N tendance upon the Synagogue Service (St. Luke 4â€"16), must give to that Service the weight of His own per- fect example. And. while He spared not to rebuke the Jews for all their corruptions, yet He never mentions, as among these, the use of a Liturgy in Public Worship, which He most iassuredly would have done. bad He viewed it in the same light in which some regard it. as a useless and vain form. But no, He set an example for His children to follow. nor did He our quality that ample bv one word of caution in this respect. On the contrary.' He added to His exam- ' ple the weight of an express com- mand in respect to a prescribed Form. 1 This, then, is my ï¬rst argument for the use Liturgies in the public Worship of Almighty Godâ€"That God directed their use among His peOple -â€"And as the end to be accomplished by them was moral and religious, and not ceremonial or typical, and, as that same end is to be accomplished at all times and under all Dispensa-l tions, so the fact that God employed for the same means a prescribed Liturgical Service. is an unanswer- able argument for the employment of the same means to accomplish the same ends now. To say, therefore, as some do. that it is the natural tendency of Prescribed Forms of Prayer. to promote Formality in Re- ligion, is to charge God, not only with having inflicted a curse upon ;His people, but with having estab- lished a precedent, a principle, for His children. till the end of time. destructive of their eternal interests. God forbid! that We draw such a conclusion! “He who knew what was in man †when he prescribed a mode of worship, Knew the wants and capacities of His children, and 4 consulted their present and eternal ‘ spiritual good. As we come down the history of the Jews, we ï¬nd in their Synagogue Service the same Form of Worship Still in use. As Dean Prideaux again observes: “The services to be per- formed in these Synagogue assemb- lies were prayers, reading the Scrip- tures, and preaching and expounding upon them. For their prayers they have Liturgies. in which are all the prescribed forms of their Synagogue worship.†leonclnsion, he adds : “This is only ' into temptation, lint deliverns from lin those cases where the people are the evil thing. For thine is the .not perfect in‘the prayers. and can- ’ Kingdom, and Thou shalt reign in lnot say the same by heart ; {or they i glory for ever, and for evermore.†iWhO can repeat the prayers do not , In His agony in the garden On'r Sav- idischarce their dub? as they ought, , iour used the same words three times iin case they themselves do not pray g in prayerâ€".The words that he used 5" with the public minister †Dean ’ are not recorded. but they cannot be ’Prideanx. in his " Connections " . regarded in any way as an ext-empor- ’gives us these 18 prayers of Ezra. ‘ aneous effusion. Amid the suï¬erings “ with the one afterwards added of the Son of God on the Cross, when "against the Nazarenes I transcribe the Keenest intensity was given to two of these prayers as beautiful His overwrought feelings. He poured specimens of Liturgical Service: " 5 out the anguish of His aï¬â€˜licted soul, Brim: "8 hack 031 our Father. to the not in an extempore effusion, but in observance Of Thy LRW. and make the golden Form of Prayer, which us adhere to Thy precepts; and do David and His prototype, composed. Thou Oh our King, draw us near to -- My God, my God, why hast Thou iThy worship. and convert us unto1 forsaken Me? (Ps. ‘22), and into Thy Thee by perfect repentance in Thy i hands I commend my spirit it (PS. .Wcsence. Blessed art Thou; Oh 1 31. 5i. 'IJOl'tl. \VllO VOUClISflfBSC t0 reCeive “Si 'l‘lli ti 1.. ° d 1 rument 1 s, ' , ,. ‘ ' ‘ by t'Olicuttmce.†“ it. Be T1103 1e 1 is our secon a g . r . in favoro ' ‘ ' ' i) the mermful unto us, Oh our 1' ather, for lactic IflLItutglcalf \\ orsih :21 and' . Q ‘ . j†-1 _ V ‘ . we have Sinnetl; pardon us, Ch 001" P a ( precept 0 out 0 l " ;.\a‘i ur, . t) | JXIng‘, for \"e have transgressodj \ 0 the (116313 lifldd Of 1 e! - n s , . Church. ; against Thee. lor l‘hou art a God. . . good and ready'to pardon. Blessed My next argument is the practicei art Thou, Oh Lord most gracious. of the inspired Apostles This argu-j who multipliest Thy mercies in the ment is simply that of Apostolic? forgiveness of sin.†I would ask A. i authority. The Church under the; B. to note the strong resemblance of’ guidance of the Apostles soon shaped’ the Church Collect to those ancient to itself, by adaptation and by com-3 paragraphic prayers-«also called 001- position, a Liturgical Service. All! leCtS. that T nhfll‘ fn "saint“:h .‘n «Ln; slant a pa: their daily worship. The may as follows: “Lord, than us which but The Liturgy. in the strict sense of the wordymeane the eervice used in celebrating the Holy Eucharist. or the Lord’e Supper. It admits of no doubt that our Saviour at the Last I required by the better religion now . professed. It is aperfectly natural . inference that the Temple worship - would be the general model of the public devotions of Christians. In accordance with this principle. we , ï¬nd that the Jewish Christians. not , only during the time embraced by . the New Testament history. but af-l terward. continued to attend regular; ly upon the Jewish Services. Thus we read of the early Christians: " They continued daily with one ac- cord in the Temple †(Aets 2â€"46). They were devotedly attached to the Service. We read that the Apostles Sts. Peter and John. “went up into the Temple. at the hour of prayer, being the ninth hour,†(Acts 3â€"1). We read that the Apostle St. Paul, after his conversion, when he went up to Jerusalem, still “prayed in the Temple,†according to his prev- ious custom. And we ï¬nd this same Apostle, as late as the sixtieth year of our Lord. making the following statement before Felix, the Roman 4 Governor: “ There are yet but twelve 1 days, since I went up to Jerusalem. ' for to worship,†(Acts 24. 11). Such was the constant practice of the Jew- ish Christians, in respect to a Mode ‘ 1 of Worship which we know to have 1 been wholly Liturgical. 3 l _ _-,--___-__- - .. 'l My next argument is the practice l sung in concert. Of the inspired Apostles This area-j Notice in the prayer these facts~- ment is simply that of Apostolicl . , that it was oliered by the congrega‘ lauthority. The Church under them)n unitedlyâ€"that they “lifted up " guidance of the Apostles soon shaped ' their Voices with one accord â€â€"â€"thai to il‘helf’ by adaptation and hy com- ‘ it has been divinely recorded for our posmon. a Liturgical Servwe. All 2 , , . learningâ€"that it bears strong intern- that I need to maintain is. that the 2‘ 31 marks of great beauty of construc- inspired Apostles. who under God i tion,and poetical nicety of expression. laid the foundations of the Church.; \iow all these facts 0 to show that were in the constant use of a. Liturg-l 't ‘was a form re-gom osed and ical Serviceâ€"they were constantly l; .1. t ti e rl) Chrisltians’ familiar with it, and their devotional amt tar 0 16 a y ' habits were all formed in accordance f Had I space to state the argument :with it. The Apostles were ailJews. l {0" the use 0‘ Inturgxes from the As such they were devoutly accus- l pracuce 0f the an‘t‘ve Church. we tomed to the Temple Service. They i should ï¬nd that no trace of the paint had been trained up from childhood l of time, when they were not in use, in the use of its prayers and sacred .' has been yet discovered. songs. When they became Christians:I Yours faithfully, the bonds which bound them to the? READER. , religions worship of the Jews were i not sundered. Nor were they meantl II to be sundered. Had the Jews as ai Catarrhozone. mass embraced the Messiah. the i change from Judaism to Christianity AN INSTANT RELIEF AND PERFECT CURE would have consisted rather in laying FOR COLDSv (’OUGHS' CATARRH’ . DEAF' aside some strictly typical institu- N333. ASTHMM BRONCHITIS: LUNG. tions. But the olive tree itself would l TROUBLE AND CONSUMPTION ' have remained. The GOSpel was ï¬rst INHALE CATARRHOZONE ï¬ve minutes preached to the Jews, in each city or any time and it kills a cough or cold place. in order that if they would te- in the head. ceive i', the Gentile converts might . - be regarded as joined to them. and INHALE CA'raaanozoas ï¬ve minutes not addedto a new body. It is but four times daily and itnper.manently AAAAAA (‘L_-â€":-n-L‘-__‘ This. then. is our second argument in favor of Liturgical \Vorship. the practice and precept of our Lord and Saviour. the Great Head of the Church. " My God. my God, ohy hast. Thou forsaken Me? (P8. 9.2), and into Thy hands I commend my spirit†(Ps. into temptation, but. deliver us from the evil thing. For thine is the Kingdom. and Thou shalt reign in glor_y for ever, and for evermore.†'ed made heaven,anâ€"¢i eartl . and all that in them is was i8 - ltnnfsctum of And Denier in W. D. CONNOR For further patient." and “chat. .pply to numt nilwav mat. A. H. NOTXAN. 0!) AUGUST 81 East of Toronto to and Midland Div. N Will be run to statiqnapq c‘ h, u-..:...1-_ 7 - [0.000 FARM LABORERS WANTED INHALE CATARRHOZONE ten minutes every hour and it cures Pneumonia. Consumption. Lung Trouble and prevents all contagious diseases. Complete outï¬t $1.00; trial size 25c. Druggists, or N. 0. Poison 00., Kingston, Ont. MOOSE 11‘ W. ES TEVAN AND YORK TON INHALE CATARRHOZONE ï¬ve minutes four times daily and it permanently cures Chronic Catarrh, Deafness, As- thma and Hay Fever. AN INSTANT RELIEF AND PERFECT CURE FOR cows, «ovens. CATARRH, DEAF- NESS, ASTHMA. BRONCHITIS, ' LUNG TROUBLE AND CONSUMPTION. INHALE CATARRHOZONE ï¬ve minutes any time and it kills a cough or cold in the head. Now all these facts go to show that it was a form pre-composed. and familiar to the early Christians. - Had I space to state the argument Notice in the prayer these facts-- that it was offered by the congrega- tion unitedlyâ€"â€"that they “lifted up their voices with one accord â€â€"that it has been divinely recorded for our learningâ€"that it bears strong intern- al marks of great beauty of construc- tion,aud poetical nicety of expression. 4. 24-450). Here we have a picture of the Christian assembly at Jerusa- lem, as " they lifted up their voices to God with one accord.†This beau- tiful prayer breathes the spirit of the early Church. It is a sort of Chris- tian Psalm. carefully composed ac- cording tc the rules of Hebrew Parallelism, and evidently said or sung in concert. And now, Lord.-behold their threat- enings, and gram unto Thy servants. that with all boldness they may Speak Thy word, by stretching forth Thine hand to heal. and that signs and wonders may be done by the Name of Thy holy child Jesus †(Acts Pumas from $2 upward who. by the mouth offl‘hy «runs, David. hast said : ' Wh did the heathen use, An the pea lo imagine vain things! The Kings 0 the earth stood up. And the rulers were gathered to that Against thé Lord, and against is Christ. For of a truth against Thy holy child Jesus. Whom Thou hast annointcd Both Herod. and Pontius Pilate, with the Gen- tiles, . A ml 1hr people of Israel were gathered together, For In (In H hulsovvur Thy hand And Thy cuuuscl determined to be done. Ant. Gcnl. Pun}. -. 4%. Toronto. Farm laborers' Excursions SECON D CLA SS 37%?- U chino! Bani-sods. no; Hoistein. com- {arable d'OmM. good but; barn. orchfldv 0002b†to achool. post oflice and Ruin." Button. Apply. BRICK COTTAGE IN A DESIR- ING lomlitv on Bruce Street. 1 It"- «won roam, two monies good cellar. hfld "Id 00“ water. lovers! bearing fruit trees. (00‘ mrdon. etc. For particulars apply ‘0 Has. A. E. Hum. Amt 2-“. Durham. ROBERT HILLIS. Varney P. 0. 4nd. D “10 UlldOl‘i‘nod, Lot 6. Concession 2. “month? or thou: the 4th day of J uly , F Horse tppsrently seven or eight Year-0,118. The Owner my hm Why prom: pmporty and man: at BARGAIN ON EASY TIER MS OF . ymout. Lots 24 and 2f.) 13 (mums. anon. ientick. Grey County. half a mile from school. a mile and a quarter from church and post oflice and a mile from saw- mnll. 145 acres cleared. mo :1ch5 in Mid state of cultivation remainder pasture land. macros good hardwood bush and 5 8389 cant“? orchtrds, trees in full beauty}. There la n bulk bun on stone inundation 7035. l brick vaneered house. 2 “911$ 90 proportâ€˜ï¬ and one never-failing spring m rear. ell fenced. For further panncnl- an tpply to July 2nd.-â€"â€"6. to school Vicâ€"hum};- a.nd price and further particu , -v-v- â€- «JUL A“ 1) Durham ROId, TUWHSMD of (Henelg. 50 acres under 200d cultivation. There is a nut brick house. Post barn and stables. well and'pmpp. s'mgll o‘rchard. (Hmveuien: On -AkAA ,00_1_) 100 ACRE FARM. TOWN- Or 1t this oflice. July I, 1902. EING LOT 9, CON. 1!. GLEN. elg. containing 100 acres-40 acres cleared and in ï¬rst class Man: 01‘ cum. vation. well fenced, “ell watered, wixh good frame dwelling and guml ulll build~ inns. Frame barn 54x64 on stone found~ ation. another frame barn 25$). Good bearing orchard of nearly MI) trees. will be sold reasonable and on easy terms. for particulars apply to the owner. TRAYED TO THE PREMISES or Jan. Nth. lyrâ€"pd o ’-.-:V‘J J‘IILK. I1. chase demrable buxlu‘mg m. do well to take a look at John .- . Inn of sub-division of Park 1,..1 munbï¬ our, north of Chester street, in the Gov. eminent Survey, of the Tom, “f I 'hrham Phil can be seen at the uï¬ice n: J, p. M: ford. Durham. or at the ofï¬ce uf the under. signed. For turther particulars amâ€). to ARCHIBALD DAVIDSON! Clerk Ui\'l>i()fl Court â€"v .. Street. tlm pruperty Browne. The home 0â€)â€; coveniently situated. am! q: lmake an excellent bual‘tlln ,particulars apply to April 30th.- ~tf. 1 seven buildings ]o_)t<â€".; of Albert street. benlg par: Also buildinglots on tho .. {ram street, bemg part “1' I Now is your time to soon For further particulars am July 10th. 190! Farm Eor Sale. April 1. *3qu LOT 53. CON and in goodï¬Ã©ta terms. Applyto N THE TOWN NY 933.391; WISHING 'm Horse Astra); 100:. cnurch and st othces Poi md furthe hermrticu rsapply to MRS. MARY MCXL'LTY. or to D. MCCORMICK, JOHN MCARTHl'R. Farm For Salv. Building lots For Sale Building lots For Se: Farm for Sale. HOU‘SEJAND LOT 0N ( Farm for Sale and Lot for Sale. ALEX. TA YLOR, CHESLEY. For Sale. DONALD tf n Priceviue P. 0.. Out GEORGE LAMB. Dafter. Mich "5 m J. M. .D MCCOSKERY I] Peter St, '1‘ tf. tf OI K Ulvmiuu Con“ Dlrunu, on 3. SOUTH am 'rone W; In 4’8ku C5- 1“ “‘3' 91:00 mam \m 1m ' anthlntuge in NH . h ‘ blood puxitim i «" . It cleanses the (n " â€item and impu: t; .u'fllctheus it and m “rpalclos that than 00 by t ruddy. healt “it and lips at ’ Outer. all skin CD broken-down con to wetk, sickly a.“ of opiriu. vinl' It. Try Ferrozo S‘ng .7 ' . We p0! box. , ironic“. or .Onc. .5. MCI) ropIiâ€"o'd :U‘ITI‘HJ hu- f ulnar wanted her i I I." bar." f“' -l'.. Fleming!» h†t5. yud with 1' “Mod to break inn. “Oct to supply 5360:. 005001 building a M 20¢!!!th suicide [W 3.: "to; become inn-1w m the back or the “Q. :51 In. Flemingm murder '0.“ .111; “3. Nu. Flemm «'an W. Flemng It is honed that Minn press will 1 it! proper light. m be (interred from ;; readily seen from ‘htt men Wm be whatever demilm‘ Without inturfermp In" no Special y mined in every x! “You will 5w there is no imnfo who know the 1 dvs every assismmw 3 given by (he otï¬vi:«.~ “I" in lOCatmg come to assist us 302 There is naming. 92.. “y cue {IOU} ('UHA wanted. nud they w “'Olllion and aspism “ The {are to \‘ presenting stub ( oï¬ciuls on and put in given n. tabs and away m They can take ('A they hive been Mange would from \"inlliymg 1 (hm “"10 ham: blip in I al‘vps‘. 31‘ puticuhr (â€are r in; that they ~1m P63 "5’ delvuan points in the pun (6 their various 4'; DFEVPBI CUngsf I A plus is also gix Winnipeg: to (195'. “Tho question 5' flat impressed in upon me last year change in our [1191i must hands. I to diCtlte to an) Ghould go. «SpH-ia.‘ dnï¬nite places in nothing. however. macmem, that \ from going to x}. those for whom â€w yours, if they adv» farmers that m. Chit such friends :1: aux-.3! Others. The following is reply. WbiCh conciw the Government has. of preparing for m tho laborers from 19;. “Plane say wim‘ you will have at \\‘i:1 in: (am Inborers to : 'h‘l’. they may dens}: inquiry I ï¬nd mam computing going {r0 hue relatives. friend when they have “m for whom they hm- work main shouH Th“. parties wili u‘... 1c“ some arrange: whereby they mm L.- ticketed through :1 dwinltiou . †5.. chi: cud next 11 â€cm ‘30†‘rï¬ requ} ad the great majori from Ontario. ‘ â€it‘ll. Provinces, in; Information X‘Pg tho tum laborers \\ ; given by the Manim in a Imminent mam floKouu. of the In} rlculture, in reply 1 Ion» received from ; uric : Hora important topic It this panic “during of the am have}; in Manitoba Inflated Her Dan; “in“!!! G MAN m the Army of F fin be Sent to Their j Pimple: and Matches. w-Q 0.0 Q»- 1am a! Cl!