The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

'n I; ‘n ‘gbese glimpses of the early Church h Britain we {601 sure that it existed {Vb widely extended portions of the had, and for muons to be given Int- a on that the Apootoiic ministry W continued in it. It is no great E“ to any, with all oonfidonco. [m Manna, ‘ tho grout legal ”All the saints salute you, chiefly they that are of Caesar’s household ;” and again, (II Tim. 4-221). “ Eubulus greeteth thee. and Pudeus, and Linus, and Claudia." I have not space to give more of the history of those royal British Christians and of their relation to St.-Paul. and I leave this part of the history with great reluctance. Nor have I Space to deal as I should like to do with St. Paul’s brief visit to Britain. Gildas. the earliest British historian, says Chris- tianity dawned on Britain as early as A. D. 61. Fortunatus says St. Paul “ passed over to Britain.” Theodor- it Bishop of Cyprus (b. 386) says: “ St. Paul at the time of his journey into Spain ” (see Rom. xv. 24.28.) “ brought salvation to the islands lying in the ocean ;” that he went to Spain and thence carried the GOSpel to other nations; and he expressly stated that some of the apostles preached to the Britons. St. Jerome (b 310) says, “St. Paul went from ocean to ocean and preached the GOSpel in the western parts, as far as the earth itself.” This expression includes Britain. Eusebius, the great historian says : °° Some of the Apostles crossed the ocean to those islands which are called British.” “ Tertullian (b. about 135) in a strong passage of his work against the Jews uses these words : “ There are places in Britain inaccessible to the Roman arms. which are subdued to Christ.” It is evident that he meant to convey the idea that British Christianityg had so widely spread among the tribes of Britain that persons were found in considerable numbers. who had embraced the religion of Jesus Christ. Roman power when Tertul- lian wrote extended from the sea- l board of Kent and Sussex to the wall of Antoninus. This implies an orig- in for Christianity in Britain in the? first century when we take the cir- cumstances into consideration. Jus- tin Martyr (b. about 100) says “ that Christianity existed in every country known to the Romans.” There can he says the historian Bore, “ no reasonable ground for doubting that the British Church was not only of very ancient. but also of Apostolic foundation." A Roman Catholic writer, not generally very favorable to the Anglican Church, whose testi- mony on that account is more valu- able. readily admits this: '° It is probable ” he says, “ that Christian- ity was disseminated over parts of England during the Apostolic age. this was universally believed by our ancestors.” In A D. 303 the British Church produced aChristian Martyr, 8t. Alban. The story c! his death reveals the fact that it was the cus- tom of the Church in his day in Brit-l ain to wear priestly or clerical gar- .ents. In 314 three British Bishops attended the Council at Arlee. The Bishops were Restitulus, Bishop of London, Eborius, BishOp of York, Adelphins, Bishop of Caerleon on Hair. Caerleon means the fort o! the legion; the Roman Legion sta- tioned there. Here King Arthur ' once flourished ; and inaugurated the Knights of the Round Table. It is about 150 miles west of London, and 'about26 miles from Bristol. It is the seat of the modern deveise of St. ; David’s, of which at this time Dr. ' Owen is Bishop. British Bishops at- tended the Council of Nice in 325, 'here the Nicene Creed, which has ever since been used in the Church .1 England was drawn up. The “hope of the early British Church =‘ .ttended the Ceuncil o! Sardisa in 847. . I! a traveller whirled across a coun- ty and every few minutes looking “to! his car window, saw each time “landscape covered with snow. he ‘ 1’ lee] sure that the snow had 1 ' ’ alleleaathe line. . Bolton ‘ l Linus the first Bishop of Rome was! aBritsin, and is with good reason.‘ believed to have been converted to Christianity in Britain before he came to Rome. His father, Caracts-, ens, spotty British'King. and his grandfather. Bran, s Druid, were carried to Rome. toxether with his sister Claudia and lived in the Im-f perial palace. Clement the 3rd Bishop of Rome, speaks of “the most holy Linus, the brother 0!! Claudia St. Paul says (Phil. 4-22); nun slams 'AC‘ULAY. British Church by whomsoever plant- â€" ed, was a stranger to the Bishon of The English Church m We Rome. and all his pretended author- 'l'ho Mm “a m. iity.” Bk. 4chap. 8. Percival has . . idevoted a whole book to prove the the ‘M lumen. {Apostolical succession in the early Dz“ Slutâ€"Let me ask your kind : British Church. I am sorrowfully indulgence and that of your readers i 3"“ that the Pagan Saxons drove whilel give a connected outline of: e native Christians from the east- the history of the Church of En laudgem part of the island to the hill from its introduction into Britagin to ‘ country 0f the west, chiefly to Wales th ' - , .and Cornwall. ‘l‘heon. Bishop of epresent, m order to [resent a:London, and Thadioc, the Bishop of full and decisive refutation of Mac- , . . 1 . . l ; lork, held their dioceses maniully ‘“ ‘y ’ “”“‘°” ‘1‘“ She "“3 °‘ 1°“. till A. D. 587; and then when their into be' ° ' mg at the Reformation. ThlS‘ flocks were scattered and a host of course is necessary as many Of your; heathen wolves were worryin the readers are not acquainted with the u . - L (1 -fi “d Ch h’ l { lh' _ fold, “hen on on 8801'] ce to are s ong and event u istory. D' . - - n . ' . nana, and \\ estrmmster to Apollo, The Christian Church was founded they fled and followed their brethren at Jerusalemâ€"Over that Mother where their Church still lives. Dr. Church at Jerusalem as all ancient Lengard, the Roman Catholic histor- wrirers declare St. James presided ian, says of the Britons: “The in- as first BlShO ). The Church of‘ dependence of their Church was the Rome was for a considerable time chief object of their solicitude.” The Christian Church was founded at Jerusalemâ€"Over that Mother Church at Jerusalem as all ancient writers declare St. James presided as first Bisho ). The Church of Rome was for a considerable time only an Oriental mission. working among Greeks and Jews of the Me- tr0polis. There is strong ground for believing- that Christianity was in- troduced into Britain, earlier than into Rome. Hore, Crackenthorp. Jones, Fleetwood. Alexander and others all historians of acknowledged ability take this view. Dian 813 :â€"Let me ask your kind ‘ indulgence and that of your readers while I give a connected outline of the history of the Church of England; from its introduction into Britain to; the present. in order to present ai full and decisive refutation of Mac-g aulay’s assertion that she was called: into being at the Reformation. This? course is necessary as many of your} readers are not acquainted with the; Church’s long and eventful history.. my. in bid Commontuios Bu a. historic law. " The main: ‘O \U W \U uhâ€"UJ v.11 Augustine was chosen to lead a . band of able and devoted missionaries .The difficulties of their mission and the discouraging accounts which were given them on their journey, caused them to diSpair of success. So Augustine returned to Gregory before he had approached Britain. Gregory re-inspired him with confid- ' ence, and Augustine set out again on his mission. In due time he and his companions reached England. It would require more than a letter to ; do justice to this part of my subject Jory how he was to deal with British and Gallican clergy, he found both 'in Britain, and how he was to deal .fwith the Liturgies also which he : foundin Britain. Gregory instructed . him to compile a new use for the , Church of the Anglesâ€"Gregory, as . we know intended if the Saxon peo- ‘ ple of England received Augustine ; that he should become their Bishop. :But he did not return to Rome for i consecration. It seemed that Greg- i cry wished the Church of the Angles ! to be as free as she could possibly be. This first consecration was a most important one. He was to be conse- ! crated “archbishop of the English : race." to quote Redd’s phrase. Had g modern teaching been in vogue Aug ' alone Augustine enquired of Greg ; ustine would have been required to i go to Rome for consecration-He l went to Arles in the south of France 1 more than half way to Romeâ€"Later i ArchbishOps of Canterbury who were i asked to go to Rome for consecration l refused. and were told that the l length of the journey was no sufiici- 1 ant reason for declining. Augustine was consecrated Archbishop of Can- 3 terbury by Vigilius Archbishop of ; Arles. the 24th Bp. of Arles, and oth- l er Gallican BishOps whose orders! l were derived through Polycarp. , Bishop of Smyrna, the disciple of St. 1 John. So that neither our early! EBritish nor our later Anglican suc- i cession began at Rome. For 52 years , these two Episcopal branches, the 1 Celtic and the Saxon, continued their separate existence in England. As ‘ years passed by, these two schools of ' Christians in the Heptarchy were drawn nearer together. and after 52 I years agreed to units under one ;.â€"\rchbishopâ€"under Theodore, who i was a Greek, born in the city of Tar- sus. the birthplace of St. Paulâ€"under , him in 668 the English. Church was “welded into one compact organism, ; long before England was anation. or I g had any central government. . This , {is " the national Church ”â€"“Tbe . j Anglican Church.” which God haw, l preserved through all the vicissitudes , of the ages to this dayâ€"a Church , which was never established by the , iState, or by'a‘ny Act of Parliament. fear-it antedates the state itself by a d hundred and fifty years. and. can ¢ udmprop’arly be said. to have estab- . listed the state. then to have been . “sill-bed by the State. .. a Shortly after the consolidation of the Anglicsn Church and during the Archepiscopsts of the Bishop who consolidated it, n grave question , Gregory’s motive for sending Aug- ustine and his companions to Britain appears. from his letters to the boy Kings of the Franks, and the Queen of the Franks, to have been the re- ported neglect of the British Clergy to minister to their Saxon invaders. ’ Gregory’s words were, “ It has come 1 to our know ledge that the nation of l the Angli is desirous through the ; mercv of God, of being converted to , the Christian Faith, but that the p priests of their neighborhood neglect 9 them, and are remiss in kindling their desires. by their own exhorta- tions.” It is easy to account for this ‘ charge of neglect against the British Clergv if we. ake their circumstances i into consideration. Their Saxon in- , vaders, hated them. persecuted them, . drove them out of their homes. seized {their churches and confiscated their { properties. The'chief Saxon King at i that time had a Christian wife. She i was the daughter of the French mon- :arch, and had brought with her. to ' her husband’s court, a Gallican Bishop Luidhart, with attendant Clergy. One of the deserted British Churches was assigned to her; for her use. Unquestionably she labored most assiduously to bring her Pagan spouse and his benighted subjects to the Christain Faith, and predisposed the King his nobles and subjects for the re-introduction of Christianity in their own dominions. It is exceedingly probable that she made. or caused to be made the ap- plication to Bishop Gregory for the re-introduction of Christianity into her dominions. The very cautious way in which Gregory refers to his informant might well imply this. From the time of the flight of the archbishop; of London and York A. D. 587 to the landing of Augustine and his companians in 597â€"the old British Church was confined chiefly to Wales, Cumberland and Cornwall. l The Statutes of the realm prove f not only that the power of the Pope ’ in England was never formally rec- ' ognized by any act of parliament, or ' other constitutional authority. but . that his claim to it was constantly repudiated and disallowed. The ' evidence upon this subject is so full ’ that it would overload the argument to introduce it at great length. In the 20th year of King Henry 3rd, we meet with the assertion. as of a fact universally acknowledged, that the Canons and decrees of the Church of Rome had hitherto been of no force in England. Statute of Merton 20,‘ Henry 3rd, chap. 9 And this asser- tion was maintained throughout. from that time to the reign of Henry 8th, to be the truth. It continued also to be the basis also of the laws of the realm, although in point of fact, the power of the Pepe was oft- entimes sufiered successfully to con- trovene the lawâ€"The reign of Ed- ward I was remarkable for a distinct i statute 35 Edward 1, Carlisle, declar. Iatory of the Church of England’s in- idependence of the Church of Rome. ,A similar declaration followed. in a! different form in 9, Edward 2, Artic. Cleri. 16. In 21, Edward 3, S. 40 it . was declared penal to procure any l presentations to benefices in England I from the Court of Rome, and in an-i other next year by which any person . carrying a cause of appeal to the Court of Rome, was outlawed. These 'laws however seem to have slumber- ed under Richard 2nd. or to have been but feebly enforced. as also an. der King Henry 4th, 5th and 6th. But they were several times confirm-' ed during these reigns, and Other similar enactments added to them. The Papal usurpation was not a part of the original Constitution of the British Church. It was an illegiti- imate dominion exercised partially. 'depending upon circumstances of secular policy, and continually pro- tested against by English bishops, , sovereigns and parliaments, from the day of its first commencement to its close. And the Church of England. therefore, having never been part of the Church of Rome, or subject law- fully to its authority, could never be guilty of the sin of schism by any rg’. )ection. atwhatever time. of Papal doctrines, discipline or practice He King could without the national con- ‘ A. B. will be puzzled to explain how the English Church by Magma Charta could have “all her whole tights and liberties inviolable,” when there was no such body as the Eng- lish Church in existence for 300 years afterwards according to his theory! lsprung up which tested the indepen- dence of that newly" 'consolidated Churchâ€"Theodore the Archbishop of Canterbury divided several of the English dioceses because he consider- ed them too large for proper Episcop- al supervision. Wilfred Bishop of ’Hexham and York opposed the divis- Sch of his. and appealed to the Pope. The Pope decided in favor of Wilfred. Wilfred returned to England with the Pope’s létter. King Osway im- mediately summoned his wise men to Whitby to consider what course should be taken. They promptly de- cided to imprison Wilfred. because he appealed to the Pope, and they flung the Pape’s letter away. Does lnot this look like an act of indepen-. dence? And this act of resistance to Papal interference has many par- allels. \Vhen Gregory 7th called on William the Conqueror to do fealty for his realm. the King solemnly re- fused to admit the claim. “ Fealty” he said, “ I have never willed to do; nor do I will to do it now.” in the statutes of the realm, which are authorities on matters of fact which no one can question. we find abund- ance of proof that the Anglican Church was the Church of the Eng- lish nation before she had a Parlia- ment and that no other Church ex- cept the Anglican had an existence in England before the Reformation in the 16th century, We have already seen in the case of Bishop Wilfred that she was then declared by the highest authority in the land to be the independent Church of the Eng- lish peOple, during the time of the Heptarchy, about 150 years before the English Parliament had any ex- istence. About 500 years afterwards in A. D. 121:”), in its first clause the Magna Charta declares, “ the Church of England (Ecclesia Anglicena) shall be free, and shall have all her whole _ rights and liberties inviolable.” The l title of the Church of the English people in 1316, is declared 9 Edward 2nd St. 1 ‘25. to be. “ The Church of, England.” In A. D. 1352, 25 Edward 3rd St. 6. we read. “ whereas the; holy Church of England,” etc. In 1383,, 9 Richard 2nd St. 0. 1 we read, “ First it is ordained and accorded that our Holy Mother. the Church of England, have all her liberties whole, and unhurt, and the same fully enjoy and use.” Stubbs the great English historian writes: “ the Parliament of 1399 declared that England had at all time passed been so free that no! Pope, nor other outside the realm ‘ had a right to meddle therein.” In! A. D. 1414, in 15 Henry 4th c. 15 thei orthodoxy of “the Church of Eng- land ” is asserted. In no act of Par- liament is there any reference to any other Church existing in England be- fore the Reformation. except "the Church of England.” A very able English writer on the unity of thel Church, uses these words: “If any man will look down along the line of,I early English history, he will see a standing conteSt between the rulers of this land and the Bishops of Rome. } The Crown and Church of England,’ with a steady opposition. resisted the l entrance and encroachment of the. secularized power of the Pope in ; England. The last rejection of it was no more than a successful effort! I r f after many a failure in struggles of the like kind.” .. -w- ---vw "55“ ml ene . He has n3 headaches nor kidney tron e, but is enjoying poi-feet health. I can honestly reoommendflbese Tablets to anyone having any tro’u‘lo with their kn n‘r- ” Dr. Pitcher’s Backache Kidney Tablets have proved themselves the greatest benefactors of all classes of railroad men. They give ease to the aching, sore back, clear up the urine, relieve the scalding and burning, and impart new life and vitality to thi urinary organs. Thére are few railroadmen who do not complain of kidney trouble in some form. HHHHHIMIH;mum...” ‘ , “Hum: ! i: Men who ‘\ work on the 5 ‘3 r a i l r o a d : % whether in the capacity -.-' of engineers, firemen, ma- , ehini’sts or ' trackmen, find that the 1 heavy work they do and the exposure to change of weather and tempera- ture very hard on their back and kid_neys. j y l l n I n “Mlllmummmum...” ‘ ,‘ “Hum“ 1' There can be no doubt that the English people made a severe Struggle and protest again and again Against Papal claims in England. Even if they were not successful, that Would not prove that the Church of Eng- land was the Church of Rome, or any part of the Church of Rome. Sup- pose for a moment that the Lieuten- ant Governor of Quebec were to us- urp authtrity [over the Province cf Ontario, and that the people of this Province were to submit to him, would that make Ontario. Quebec. or even a part of Quebec? Clearly not. Neither would the submission of the Church of England, to the Church of Rome make it the Church of Rome. 2. Neither could they have be- lieved in Papal infallibility, or they would not have resisted the Pope which they unmistakably did since the episcopate of 'l‘heoaore Who con- solidated the “ Ecclesia Anglicana ” â€"the Anglican Churchâ€"The history of the Church of England revealsa continued struggle to maintain its independence against the usurping power of the Papacy backed by its political influence in Europe. But not for one hour did the Church of England so far succumb as to lose its national character and title. The Roman idea of effacing all national Churches is not of primitive origin, and did not reach its fulfilment until the Council of Trentâ€"3t) years after the English Reformation, when the national Churches in communion with the Church of Rome formed a confederacy and merged their nation- a1 existence into it. 1. The Statutes plainly show that they could not have believed in Pa- pal supremacy, or they never would have passed these statutes. It is plain to my mind that our an- cestors who passed these statutes were not Roman Catholics by these facts. sent, subject his kingdom to a foreign power. The statute passed in 1352, was enacted to prevent the Pope from presenting English Bishoprics and benefices and as being a usurpa- tion on the rights of the King and his subjects. This statute and others show that they were passed by mem- bers of the Church of England, for the protection of the Church of England. and not by members of the Roman Church for the protec- tion of the Roman Churchâ€" English Churchmen in those days considered that they were ofiending against no law of the Catholic Church in resisting the encroachments and usurpations of the Roman Bishop. The fact that the Church of England was then in communion with the See of Rome, no more made it a part of the Roman Church than its being then in communion also with the Church of France made it a part of the French or Gallican Church. This is a very simple proposition. but it is strange how muddle-headed many peOple are apt to be about it. The Provinces of Ontario and Quebec are both parts of the Dominion, and owe allegience to the same Sovereign, and both are in communion with each other, but Ontario is not a part of Quebec, nor Quebec a part of Ontario. So it is with the Catholic Church. all parts of it owe allegience to our Sov- ereign Jesus Christ ; and no part of it can be cut 03 or excommunicated because it refuses to own the suprem- acy of any particular bishop, any more than one Province can be cut off because it refuses to acknowledge the governor of another Province as its head. Railroad Men’s Backache. (Continued on page 3.) MASTER: no coon. . In." ‘X7.‘-.... 4, 7. A FULL LINE OF GROCERIES AT LOWEST PRICES. CUSTOM Wool Wanted. We have a full line of STERLING BROS Hand-made Shoes. Salada Ceylon Tea in black, All-wool Dress Serges. Black and Colors, 40-in wide, Zfic'yard. Heavy Melton Dress Goods, 42in wide, only 25c yard. White Bed Spreads, large size. $1.15 each. Flannelette Blankets, large size, $1.00 pair. Bed Comforters, 60x72 inches, $1.00 each. Ladies’ Long Sleeve Vests, 25c each. 20 Only Glass Table Sets, 35c each. Slireaded Wheat Biscuits, 25c box. C. SMITH SONS He Sells Cheap ! BIG 4, Built in 6, 8, 9 and 12 foot lengths, with many real good improvements. Full particulars will be given, so don’t hesitate to inquire. For Summer Fallows or Fall wheat ground or on Stubble fields. The most perfect implement for working Sod, Fall Plowing or Prairie. Call and see the Disk Harrows and Steel Rollers made by T. E. Bissell, of Elora, Out. We handle‘ them. DURHAM F 0UNDRY green and mixed. in LEAD PACKETS at 250. me and 400 lb. -â€"--"-- '-- -.r --\u-l=uunu unu la!el' exceues. Belt Dbl!“ end constitutional 31000 Diseases have ruined and wrecked the life of many: promising cunt mtfl- 3.3" 1‘0“ any 09“" following symptoms: Nervous and Despondent; ired in Morning 3 o Ambition; Memory Poor; Easily Fatigned; Excitable and Irritsble; E es Blur; Pimples on the Face; Dreams and Drains at Night; Restless; Hag ard ookma’: Blotches; Sore Throat; Hair Loose; Pains in the‘Body: Sunken Eyes; Lifeless; Distrustfnl and Lsclr of Energy snd Strepk'lh' Our New Holland Treatment will build you up mentally. phystcally and sexually. Cure- Guaranteed or no Pay. mL -. 2! YEAR. If! “TROUT. BANK OIWY. -- ‘ Wu...“ .w" . - I”-.. " ' f V 22:?!“ BREW?" editedfi'fiis. Kennedy'i Xo'r‘an teu’i'ntg'my " m Vitality. I took the New H earn the ma and came. Self than had sappe y cued Datum “d menu-d. M friends think I w“ cured of Canaumption. I have nut them can ham. and)! mum: were cufldo Their NB' Method Treatment «9le vigor um, and mnhood.” Con-“wo- 3m. to.» n... mum-r m m to: I... tum. Dr; Kenna" Rm... «9 MM Thousands of Young.“ Mulldle ed Ma nae annual! swept t remature ran through early ‘Idlscrctlgns and lag eggs-9.. Self abfim and Czigtitutional 100d D‘m h". 'fl‘n-J -- _._--c_- n 4 STEEL ROLLER 'ycalc, Nervous, Discased Men. DISK HA RROW . H. BEAN. CALL AND SEE THEM u n nnnr A3 USUAL a large assortment of Bla‘nayfits‘. 3 an): TweedS. Wo'steds and Flannels. Ready-Mack SI ”‘5 away. on hand. Suits to order on shortest natice. LINE OF GROCERIES IST PRICES. So SCOTT. SHOES SNAPS KEEP AS USUAL a large Highest Price in cash or Trade for any quantity of wool. ARDXNG and Spinning promptly attended ‘0- CALDER BLOCK. JACOB KRESS, UNDERTAKING PRICES CITT‘ Also a First Class Hearse always in connection. Em- balming a speciaity. April 14th. L' 12 to 20 months nld. Tm; reds and two roams choicely bred. OUR YOUNG BULLS FROM 12 to 20 months uld- Tm. reds and Jan. mth. lyrâ€"pd. DI'RHAM. ONT Furn lture . . . I]. chase desirable building lots would do well to take a look at John A. Warren's Inn of fiubcdivision at Park Lot number our, north of Chester street, in the Gov- eminent. Survey, of the Town of Durham. Plan can be seen at the office oi J. 1’. Tel- ford. Durham. or at the office of the under- signed. For turtlier particulars apply to wvw¢u 1) Durham Road Township or Gleuelg 50 acres under stood cultixatiun. There rs a neat brick house. Post barn and stables well and pump. small orchard. Lumeniem to school, church and est 0111 ces my price and further hparticufirs apply to MRS. MARY MCNLLTY. or to D. McCoamcx, JOHN MCARTHL’R. Or at this oflice. July 1, 19023. u-O‘V' "'V" ”9 VV“' "‘9 UL. P 618. containing 100 acres-~90 a ceared and in first class state of (; vation. well fenced. well watered. - good frame dwelling and good out b4 was. Frame barn 54x64 011 “Hue to ation, another frame barn 23x3), ( bearing orchard of nearly 100 trees. m; sold reasonable and on easy lerms, particulars apply to the uwnm \. Ill 1 seven buildings lots 0.. “Te ‘19”; of Albert street. being part uf Lots 10 Also buildinglots on the east side ..f( fun street. being part of Lots 10 11 July 10th. 1331. hUUSE AND LOT ON QUEEN A Street. the property of Mrs . . J. 1“ Browne. The house contalns 12 l'wvms‘ coveniently Situated. and finite he“. will make an excellent boardmg hmufl Fur particulars apply to 5O April 1. terms. 'A'pply t6 N THE TOWN or 1mm“ ..... II LII:'I‘:nt-n ‘A‘.- A_ Short Horn Bulls For Sale. EING up 53.1303: 3. SOUTH NY PERSON WISHING TO PER. EI_NG LO'If 9, cox. 1.4, c Building lots For Sale. _â€" â€"â€"-vu1, “‘ . Gleuolg: Well fenced :n good state of cultivxftlilgn A ‘n'" A»- HOUSE AND LOT Acm-gs, Lgr _E_IG HT, x That is sure to please can always be purchased here. Building 013 For Sale Farm for Sale. Farm for Sale ARCHIBALI) DAVIDSON For Sale. DONALD MCCOSKERY tf 11 Peter Stu ' m- H. PAfRKER, Durham I Clerk Divasiuu Court GEORGE LAMB, “after. Mi. Priceville P. 0.. Out tf. tf DURHAM. ONT. tor-1” .cr” 1% of culu. 'atered, with 3LEN. oronto. ‘0 M history, correctly 1 * Moh cleurlv and posit! I, go the time of the Cuum ' w .‘ “Church of Rome was , H “9.". of the Christian (.‘h g. Rome and the sum .000, had that What , gt the Council of '1‘:-m.1 £1“ “nation of the name (.f; H march to all those- nag W (such as the Church .3”. Spain Imd Germany .. V ‘ In," a. Church of Frau-w. a.” 0‘ Spain, or NW (“”3 ’ H the Church of Rom Mt thg Church of lionm. l .“Ifl'd to my one before Hipq did Nut; ‘nd even {he deg” m 00an of Trent as {urn-11113.1 that“ of Pius 1V witnessq Emuoxiltonoe of distinct ha -mhfl. for that Creed dd .m- w- -â€"â€"- - 7_ a “O'Chfll'Ch of Rome is goth-r and miltreus 0! 3110A”- h‘ch it is evident that on of the Roman th the mother and Thil fig nodorn development c NM”. 5W8 no doubti M a. no distinct national at“. ”no all Churches whi «sound orthodox by Ron who! oboorbod into the fly now Cttholic and Ap M ;" but this after all is I 0|th, like u good many a” m not the pri a “It id“ prOthent 0‘ who: won utrictly the Roman 1 “all hoornc out by a past it“. who records that amo1 why in on. custom of masses 4 “it! tho Holy Roman Chum “0th.? in the Church of ( To which Papa Gregory mad mwor: “You, my brother: the custom of the Romish (,‘hu which you remember that 301 .0“ were brought up. But I mum is. that Whether in rm 1 uno- il, thtt whether 1: or the Gallic») or in any bun found anything u- nor. planning to 0mm you eurofnlly select. a (ll Mutation impart 1 o! “I. English, which :7 to tho ftith, what thin; “e. Cth to collect Churches. For thium { ‘0'“ (01' the sake u. pm for the sake of '. ouch individual ('h'uw choooo the things \\‘i.' Which ure religious. :; ad deposit thew 1h; , “V. collected 11.911: : bundle, in the min-7» I for their use." If (#11,? therefore, that Ion; ; . :; Reformation thm'r body in Engla“ ad was known Church of Engla OCH III the language of Q... . :. “Thor. was no new {AU 1. z ‘! E."Ivlld. no new wings h“ m! Which was «mun » . ratiour. pracused «5 xi hang“! from page 2.» Ming opim of the u. m.: “TOUChiIIK nu KM rtmem, and. mm: ‘0. Opel-k, or understand W! to the must H01] the H‘ ‘T' “Itch ; but pun ly and fl and teach lhOSH !h I bud learnvd of t ‘ IO. and of the “oh 0‘ Christ from the l ”swans MACA'I‘ \\' VC 1